"We only use 10% of our brains" is one of the most commonly held brain myths. But as the Neuroscience for Kids website tells us,
There is no scientific evidence to suggest that we use only 10% of our brains.Neuroscientists, of course, already know that. But are there other false beliefs about the brain? Brain Mythology is a new column in the journal Brain Structure and Function, edited by Laszlo Zaborszky and Karl Zilles. In the first installment, Hilgetag and Barbas (2009) ask the question, Are there ten times more glia than neurons in the brain?
Neuroscience students take it for granted that there are many more glia than neurons in the brain. Neuroscience textbooks state with confidence: “Although there are many neurons in the human brain…, glia outnumber neurons by tenfold” (Bear et al. 2006) or, not to be outdone, even by “10–50 times”, as claimed in another text (Kandel et al. 2000). This fact is happily invoked by gliologists to promote the status of their field.Damn those status-conscious gliologists! They've been leading us astray!
Given this well-accepted figure, we were surprised when our cell counts in the prefrontal cortex of the rhesus monkey turned up a glia-to-neuron ratio (GNR) of just about 1 (Dombrowski et al. 2001). There was some regional variation, but no prefrontal area had a GNR larger than 1.2. Maybe the proportion of glia is very different in other cortical regions or other parts of the brain, so that the overall ratio for the whole brain is much larger than 1? Classic studies, however, conducted by O’Kusky and Colonnier (1982) in the opposite pole of the brain, the visual cortex, had reported an even lower GNR of 0.5.
From Fig. 5A (Dombrowski et al., 2001). The ratio of glia/neurons in prefrontal areas or subdivisions of areas.
The origin of the glial dominance myth is not clear at all. Hilgetag and Barbas conclude by mentioning that...
Since the number of synapses increases faster than the number of neurons in larger brains, this affiliation of glia with the multitude of neural connection points may help explain... For example, in large brains such as the human brain... there may be as many as 1.4 astrocytes for each neuron, up from 0.33 in the rodent cortex (Nedergaard et al. 2003). Even that ratio, however, is still a long way from the myth of 10 times more glia than neurons, in any species.Those species include humans of course, who are like monkeys with a nearly perfect 1:1 neuron:glia ratio [as noted by Jason Snyder].
References
Bear MF, Connors B, Paradiso M (2006). Neuroscience—exploring the brain, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.
Dombrowski S, Hilgetag CC, Barbas H (2001). Quantitative architecture distinguishes prefrontal cortical systems in the rhesus monkey. Cereb Cortex 11:975–988.
Hilgetag, C., & Barbas, H. (2009). Are there ten times more glia than neurons in the brain? Brain Structure and Function, 213 (4-5), 365-366. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-009-0202-z
Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM (eds) (2000). Principles of neural science, nerve cells and behavior, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 22.
Nedergaard M, Ransom B, Goldman SA (2003). New roles for astrocytes: redefining the functional architecture of the brain. Trends Neurosci 26:523–530
O’Kusky J, Collonnier M (1982). A laminar analysis of the number of neurons, glia, and synapses in the adult cortex (area 17) of adult macaque monkeys. J Comp Neurol 210:278–290.
Image via EduSpaces.
Have the gliologists figured out yet how glia grow? Do glia find a neuron to accompany, and thus tend to have numbers similar to neurons? Do glia detect other glia and avoid being too close, and avoid becoming a mass of glia? Do brain stem cells become glia as well as neurons?
ReplyDeleteI must admit that I fell for this piece of gliological propaganda too... in fact I'm fairly sure I have mentioned it in at least a couple of my posts. Thanks for the correction...
ReplyDeleteHi,
ReplyDeleteyes, 1 non-neuronal cell to every neuron is what we found recently in the male human brain (Azevedo et al., 2009, in http://bit.ly/14SvRp). It's exactly the same proportion as in other primate brains. This fact, together with how well the numbers of cells in the human brain match the expected for a generic primate of our brain size, led us to conclude that our brain is just a regular, linearly scaled-up primate brain - at least in what concerns its numbers of neurons... More in http://www.suzanaherculanohouzel.com/lab
What do you mean by "glia"? Astrocytes? Astrocytes + oligodendrocytes? Astrocytes + oligodendrocytes + microglia?
ReplyDeleteThen you ask the question, if there are more glial cells in "the brain", but your answer is restricted to "cerebral cortex". I see a difference here.
At the end of the day, the number of these cell types is not important anyhow. Let alone the existence of a perfect (???) 1:1 ratio.
I would argue that at least half of human "intelligence" can be attributed to our glia, and particularly our beautiful astrocytes.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23472873
This is science without the need for fiction.
The 10:1 ratio of glia to neurons was not necessarily about the brain but possibly a more general statement. Peripheral axons are associated with large numbers of Schwann cells and can be very long, which would change the overall ratio. Also the modern calculations come from the cortex and it is my impression so far that the authors did not make white matter measurements. That would tend to exclude a proportion of glia with cell bodies in the white matter from the total.
ReplyDelete