Thursday, February 03, 2011

Buyology Phrenology?


Four by four matrix of Neurotypes™ according to Buyology Inc™

Neuromarketing firm Buyology Inc™ has released its Most Desired U.S. Brands Report:
Johnson & Johnson, Sony, Mastercard and Kleenex Most Desired Brands for Women
Amazon Beats Walmart as the Most Desired Retailer
BMW, Hyundai and Lexus Among Most Desired Brands for Men

February 2, 2011 (New York, NY) – Johnson & Johnson, Sony, Crest and BMW appear at the top of the First Annual "Most Desired Brands in the U.S." Report. The report, released by leading global strategic neuromarketing firm Buyology Inc, is the first to quantitatively type and measure consumer relationships with brands. The full report can be found at www.buyologyinc.com.

The Most Desired U.S. Brands Report is the result of more than 6 years and $8 million, testing 240 global brands with more than 5000 consumers.
Here are the top 5:

RankWomenMen
#1Johnson & JohnsonCrest
#2SonyBMW
#3KleenexNational Geographic
#4National GeographicPanasonic
#5MasterCardHyundai

The Brand Most Desired by Men in the U.S. is Crest? Hyundai (#5) is more desirable than Lexus (#10)? Really? Roger Dooley discussed these and some of the other less predicted [i.e., completely surprising] findings at his Neuromarketing blog, noting that "The actual methodology used to produce this brand ranking is a bit sketchy."

So what are the elusive Neurotypes™?
Neurotypes™ quantitatively determine which of sixteen relationships a brand or business currently has for a given target audience and the relative strength of the relationship, or signal strength, relative to competitors and other, beacon brands who, although they may be outside the category, have successfully established similar relationships. Once typed and calibrated, a marketer can use Neurotypes to assess the impact of their current marketing activities, determine what activities will be more effective in the future and gain provocative and proprietary insights on how to strengthen the brand's relationships across the 6P framework (product, package, placement (distribution), price, promotion and positioning).
The Neurotype™ matrix yields a few surprises of its own. Taco Bell relates to its audience through Superiority and Harmony [just like Apple]. In contrast, Crest exploits the winning combination of Harmony and Superiority. Wal-Mart has a relationship of Exploration and Harmony with its customers [just like Facebook].

I'm reminded of the four personality types according to chemistry.com:



Each of these chemistry types is associated with a dominant neurotransmitter or hormone (serotonin, testosterone, dopamine, estrogen), according to resident anthropologist Dr. Helen Fisher. Although a simplistic caricature of personality differences, at least the proposed biological correlates are obvious.

But where does the neuro enter the marketing picture for Neurotypes™?
Buyology has developed proprietary physiological measurements based on brain and eye reaction to marketing stimulus that directly impacts in-market performance. These measures are collected either via Central Location Testing utilizing medical grade EEG and state-of-the art eye tracking equipment or via a global pre-recruited in-home panel via web-based stimuli and Bluetooth EEG collection equipment. The in-home methodology is web based, scalable and offers the client very quick results at a much lower cost while still providing superior results gathered in a more natural, in-home environment.
Non-conscious Marketing Stimuli Testing Output


Of course, we'll never be able to evaluate any of this, because the proprietary research is not peer reviewed. So it's black box phrenology, without the convenient localization map of its ancestors.


Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

6 Comments:

At February 03, 2011 2:18 AM, Anonymous Finn Årup Nielsen said...

"Although a simplistic caricature of personality differences, at least the proposed biological correlates are obvious." (of Helen Fisher's).

Why would it be a "simplistic caricature" and "obvious"?

I see that Fisher's "explorer" could relate to Cloninger's "Novelty Seeking" that he also suggests to be associated with the dopamine system. Is Cloninger's system a simplistic caricature? (With a good argument I could perhaps be persuaded :-)

Fisher's "builder" seems to be related to Cloninger's Harm Avoidance, but both Big Five's Neuroticism and Conscientiousness. To me Conscientiousness is not "obviously" associated with serotonin. And I am neither sure about Neuroticism.

 
At February 03, 2011 3:06 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Great post! Gotta love those neurocharlatans. These days, getting a faculty position is as likely as winning the lottery, so maybe I should start my own phrenology enterprise.

 
At February 03, 2011 9:10 AM, Blogger The Neurocritic said...

Finn Årup Nielsen - Oh, I meant the more basic fact that there are specific biological correlates is obvious. Associating one neurotranmitter or hormone with a personality type is the "simplistic caricature" part. BUT: "We're a combination of all four systems," Fisher says [even in the USA Today article].

In contrast, "Neurotypes" seem to have no basis at all in biology.

I'm not an expert in personality by any means, but I wrote about Cloninger's system in Bad News for the Genetics of Personality:

Cloninger's theory of personality is not without its critics. In 2008, Farmer and Goldberg challenged the psychometric validity of the TCI [Temperament and Character Inventory] in a target article and in a wonderfully titled reply to Cloninger. A trenchant quote from the latter (Farmer & Goldberg, 2008) is below:

"Overall, several core theoretical assumptions and predictions associated with the psychobiological model and TCI-R assessment are either non-falsifiable, in conflict with each other, or not supported by empirical evidence."

 
At February 03, 2011 12:42 PM, Blogger Neuroskeptic said...

I think Buyology's brand is based on a careful combination of Bravery, Utility, Love, Laughter, Solutions, Help, Impressions and Tempo.

 
At February 04, 2011 7:52 AM, Blogger A Bitter Pill said...

Proprietary sounds a bit like snake oil. Even if they are on to something with their eye movement measures (but doubtful), they are certainly off on a delusive journey with their abstractified categorizations and interpretations. But you have to admire the audacity of marketing this absurdity to marketers.

 
At February 05, 2011 1:03 PM, Anonymous Will said...

They couldn't even get a real psychologist/neuroscientist... they had to settle for anthropologist as their "in-house expert."

What crap.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

eXTReMe Tracker