In the previous post
, The Neurocritic discussed an article in Nature
in which greater activity in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex
(rACC) was associated with optimism1
(Sharot et al., 2007). "But wait!" you might say, "what about the sad cingulate
?" Neuroimaging studies have shown that the sad subgenual cingulate (Brodmann area 25
), located beneath the genu of the corpus callosum, is overly active in depression (Mayberg et al., 2000;
see also Greicius et al., 2007). This excessive activity is dampened in those who respond to six weeks of fluoxetine treatment (Prozac, an SSRI
antidepressant), but remains elevated in those who don't. Is this the same brain region in the two experiments? Let's take a look.
On the left is Fig. 2a of Mayberg et al. (2000), showing a decrease in area 25
(Cg25) activity in fluoxetine responders, as measured by PET. On the right is Fig. 2b of Sharot et al. (2007), showing the optimistic rACC region. At first glance, the two "hot spots" appear to be in quite similar locations. However, there are differences in the precise centers of mass, as indicated by the respective x y z
coordinates (according to Talairach and Tournoux
, a standard 3D atlas of the human brain), and in the designated Brodmann areas
(numbered cortical regions based on cytoarchitecture
| ||x, y, z ||BA |
|Mayberg ||10,22,-14 ||25 |
|Sharot ||-11, 42, -1 ||32 |
coordinate indicates right or left hemisphere, y
is anterior/posterior, and z
is dorsal/ventral. Although activations in medial structures generally aren't discussed in terms of left/right hemisphere, because the margin of error is often greater than the distance from the midline (x
= 0), here they're centered 10 mm right and 11 mm left of midline, respectively. Furthermore, the Sharot activation is 20 mm in front of the Mayberg activation. Finally, the activations are indicated by different Brodmann areas
. Hmm, not the same.
More recently, Mayberg's group demonstrated that deep brain stimulation
(DBS) in area 25 was effective in treating severe intractable depression in a small group of patients (Mayberg et al., 2005).
Each [of the six patients] met stringent criteria for treatment resistance defined as failure to response to a minimum of four different antidepressant treatments, including medications, evidence-based psychotherapy, or electroconvulsive therapy, administered at adequate doses and duration during the current episode.
In this procedure, a stimulating electrode is stereotaxically implanted
in the targeted region. Dr. Helen Mayberg
and her colleagues at Emory University are still recruiting patients with treatment resistant depression
to participate in a clinical trial using chronic, high frequency stimulation of the subgenual cingulate white matter. To determine the anatomical connectivity of the sad cingulate region, a new study performed tractography
(using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging) to trace the pathways mediating treatment response with DBS (Johansen-Berg et al., 2007
). The authors compared the connections of the subgenual ACC (sACC, blue/cyan) and the perigenual ACC (pACC, red/yellow), which appears to be the optimistic rACC region of Sharot and colleagues.Figure 3 (Johansen-Berg et al., 2007). Connectivity-based parcellation of ACC and location of electrode contacts. (A, B) Population probability maps of connectivity-defined sACC and pACC. Color scales represent the population probability of a voxel belonging to sACC (from 50% [dark blue] to 80% [light blue] probability) or pACC (from 50% [red] to 80% [yellow] probability). Also shown are the locations of effective electrode contacts from 9 patients overlaid in black. Effective electrode locations are mainly localized within the sACC subregion.
Can we directly link the "optimistic rACC" (pACC) to depression, as stated in the Nature
paper? Or more specifically, to DBS efficacy [and Prozac efficacy]
, as indicated by the work of Mayberg and colleagues? Not really. The effective electrode contacts were in sACC. The critical comparison of sACC vs. pACC connectivity is illustrated below. Is the latter highly interconnected with the amygdala? Doesn't seem to be.From Figure 4 (Johansen-Berg et al., 2007). Tracts from sACC and pACC regions. (A–F) Population maps of results of probabilistic tractography from the pACC and sACC subregions. Color scales represent the population probability of a voxel belonging to a pathway from pACC (A, B, red to yellow) or sACC (C–F, dark blue to light blue). Abbreviated labels indicate gray matter regions that are connected with sACC or pACC via these pathways. (A, B): Pathways from pACC connect with the anterior midcingulate cortex, AMCC (A); frontal pole, FP (A); nucleus accumbens, NAC (A); hypothalamus (A); and fornix (B). (C, D, E, F): Pathways from the sACC connect with the orbitofrontal cortex, OFC (C, F); NAC (C, D); hypothalamus (C, D); AMCC (C); fornix (C); and amygdala (E, F).
How do we account for these discrepancies in the Nature
paper? The tractography article was published after the former went to press, but earlier work by Mayberg et al. was neglected. However, other results were cited (Drevets et al., 1997). These investigators found resting metabolic activity in ventral ACC to be reduced
in both unipolar and bipolar depression, contrary to sad cingulate hyperactivity. What's up with that? Here's what Mayberg et al. (2005) suggest:
The baseline pattern of subgenual cingulate hyperactivity in combination with frontal hypoactivity described here in this TRD patient group is a finding that is in contrast to the hypoactivity reported in a more rostral region of subgenual medial prefrontal cortex in familial bipolar and unipolar depressed patients (Drevets et al., 1997). This distinction suggests important differences across subtypes of depression that are potentially relevant to the pathophysiology of major depressive disorders and perhaps their treatment.
What have we learned? Location matters. It's helpful to read the literature. So it goes...Footnote1 Positive correlation with optimism was for the contrast imagine future events (positive) versus imagine future events (negative).References
Drevets WC, Price JL, Simpson JR Jr, Todd RD, Reich T, Vannier M, Raichle ME. (1997). Subgenual prefrontal cortex abnormalities in mood disorders
Greicius MD, Flores BH, Menon V, Glover GH, Solvason HB, Kenna H, Reiss AL, Schatzberg AF. (2007). Resting-state functional connectivity in major depression: abnormally increased contributions from subgenual cingulate cortex and thalamus
. Biol Psychiatry
Johansen-Berg H, Gutman DA, Behrens TE, Matthews PM, Rushworth MF, Katz E, Lozano AM, Mayberg HS. (2007). Anatomical Connectivity of the Subgenual Cingulate Region Targeted with Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression
. Cereb Cortex
. Oct 10; [Epub ahead of print]. free PDF Chronic deep brain stimulation (DBS) of subgenual cingulate white matter results in dramatic remission of symptoms in some previously treatment-resistant depression patients. The effects of stimulation may be mediated locally or via corticocortical or corticosubcortical connections. We use tractography to define the likely connectivity of cingulate regions stimulated in DBS-responsive patients using diffusion imaging data acquired in healthy control subjects. We defined 2 distinct regions within anterior cingulate cortex based on anatomical connectivity: a pregenual region strongly connected to medial prefrontal and anterior midcingulate cortex and a subgenual region with strongest connections to nucleus accumbens, amygdala, hypothalamus, and orbitofrontal cortex. The location of electrode contact points from 9 patients successfully treated with DBS lies within this subgenual region. The anatomical connectivity of the subgenual cingulate region targeted with DBS for depression supports the hypothesis that treatment efficacy is mediated via effects on a distributed network of frontal, limbic, and visceromotor brain regions. At present, targeting of DBS for depression is based on landmarks visible in conventional magnetic resonance imaging. Preoperatively acquired diffusion imaging for connectivity-based cortical mapping could improve neurosurgical targeting. We hypothesize that the subgenual region with greatest connectivity across the distributed network described here may prove most effective.
Mayberg HS, Brannan SK, Tekell JL, Silva JA, Mahurin RK, McGinnis S, Jerabek PA. (2000). Regional metabolic effects of fluoxetine in major depression: serial changes and relationship to clinical response
. Biol Psychiatry
Mayberg HS, Lozano AM, Voon V, McNeely HE, Seminowicz D, Hamani C, Schwalb JM, Kennedy SH. (2005). Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression
Sharot T, Riccardi AM, Raio CM, Phelps EA. (2007). Neural mechanisms mediating optimism bias
. Oct 24; [Epub ahead of print].