Saturday, August 18, 2007

The Secret To My Success...




...in the movies!

Study Analyzes Secrets to Movie Success
Associated Press - August 17, 2007

. . .

Films that earn awards and praise from reviewers tend to be R-rated and based on a true story or a prize-winning play or novel, says professor Dean Simonton. The original author or the director usually have written the screenplay.

Big-budget blockbusters - whether they're comedies, musical, sequels or remakes - don't ordinarily draw acclaim, Simonton found. Neither do summer releases, PG-13 movies, movies that open on thousands of screens or ones that have enormous box office numbers in their first weekend.

. . .

"I had this hope that there was a difference between blockbusters and really great art films - films that can be considered great cinematic creations," said Simonton, who presented his findings Friday at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association in San Francisco. "It was gratifying to find out they're very, very different and you can find out what's different about them."

. . .

"Brokeback Mountain" is a prime example of what Simonton discovered. It was rated R, had an 87 percent approval rating on the Metacritic.com Web site and it came out at the height of prestige-picture time in December 2005. It featured a top-notch creative team, including director Ang Lee and screenwriters Larry McMurtry and Diana Ossana, working from a short story by Pulitzer Prize winner Annie Proulx. The film cost $14 million to make and grossed nearly $175 million worldwide. It was nominated for eight Oscars and won three.
You mean Daddy Day Camp won't be nominated for an Oscar?



ADDENDUM [and note that NONE of these comments apply to The Neurocritic]:
"Critics are academic types who want to prove how smart they are. They're professional grouches who think a critic's job is to be critical," said [Tom] O'Neil, columnist for theenvelope.com Web site. "Unfortunately, great critics tend to be social misfits with extraordinary powers of observation. Being misfits, they tend to bash sentimental movies because they remind them of a loving, nurturing world to which they do not belong."

Laura Elena Harring in Mulholland Dr.

A great example of this, he said, came in 2002. The best-picture winner at the Oscars was Ron Howard's uplifting "A Beautiful Mind" (which was based on a prize-winning book about a true story) but several critics' groups gave their top honors to David Lynch's dreamlike "Mulholland Dr."

"Even though," O'Neil points out, "David Lynch said publicly he had no idea what the movie was about."

Silencio!

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

5 Comments:

At August 26, 2007 8:16 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Fucking fuckwit. Still no traffic I see. Maybe you should fucking die.

 
At August 26, 2007 3:37 PM, Blogger soul said...

anonymous seems to have a screw or 2 loose? maybe, The Neurotic can moderate posts so he doesn't have to experience this kind of evilness for a very demented soul.
Peace,
soul

 
At August 26, 2007 4:12 PM, Blogger The Neurocritic said...

Thank you, kind soul. I actually am moderating comments (and have deleted some even worse than that), but it was time to stop censoring and start exposing the pathetic little coward...

 
At March 14, 2009 10:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Really!? You think David Lynch actually has no idea what his film is about? Really!? Lynch has always said that everything you need to interpret his film is in the film, thus making discussing the film unnecessary. He simply does not like to explain his films. He was feeding a line!

 
At March 15, 2009 11:07 AM, Blogger The Neurocritic said...

Really!? You think I was taking David Lynch seriously when he said he has no idea what his film is about? Really!?

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

eXTReMe Tracker